Nolle prosequi as an explanation can be made by a prosecutor in a criminal proceeding either before or during the trial, which leads the prosecutor to refuse to continue the trial of the accused. Courts rarely file complaints against Nolle prosequi`s claims. In the United States, judges will generally sign a warrant for release prepared by the prosecutor`s office or make a docket inscription indicating the order of the case as Nolle Prosse following a statement or request from the prosecutor. On the other hand, nolle prose, which is usually made after a decision on legal proceedings has already been made. The variation of prosecutions can be motivated by many reasons, such as . B weak evidence or conflict of interest.  The prosecutor`s attempts to enter a Nolle Prosequi to avoid a trial that ended, for example, where a jury might have flagged its likely judgment, where the case went wrong for the prosecution, or where the prosecutor acted without an unavailable witness, were considered by the Australian courts to be an abuse of trial. , since the prosecutor can hope to revive the charge before another jury or with the missing witness. This rule also applies when the seizure of nolle prose, which was not called into question when it was made.
 A number of other cases have been brought before the Australian courts, claiming that the reintroduction of the indictment after the introduction of a Nolle Prosequi constituted an abuse of process in other circumstances. None was successful because the relevant circumstances did not constitute abuse, but the Court of Appeal found that there could be a case in which an indictment after the introduction of a nolle could be depressing, and therefore an abuse of the judicial process.  The power to enter a Nolle-Prose, which is rarely used today, most often in cases where an accused is physically or mentally unfit to appear or where a titular member of the public has initiated private criminal proceedings which, according to the Attorney General, is not in the public interest.  In the past, it has also been used to protect a person who has been granted immunity from prosecution.  A nolle prose, which does not defer the case without limitation of duration, not as an acquittal.